GIL vs. BABO
GIL (Gildan Activewear Inc.) is a stock, while BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, GIL returned 10.08% vs 1.60% for BABO. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GIL vs. BABO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIL achieves a -10.55% return, which is significantly higher than BABO's -15.94% return.
GIL
- 1D
- 5.49%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- 6M
- -14.02%
- YTD
- -10.55%
- 1Y
- 10.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.67%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.72%
BABO
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- 21.29%
- 6M
- -25.18%
- YTD
- -15.94%
- 1Y
- 1.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $214.70K | $279.41K | $371.42K | |
| $103.28M | $77.54M | $85.70M |
GIL vs. BABO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc. | -10.55% | 35.08% | 18.75% |
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF | -15.94% | 46.84% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIL and BABO is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIL vs. BABO — Risk / Return Rank
GIL
BABO
GIL vs. BABO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIL | BABO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.03 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | -0.03 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | -0.05 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIL vs. BABO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIL drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than BABO's maximum drawdown of -42.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL and BABO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIL | BABO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.23% | -42.63% | -44.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.06% | -42.63% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.02% | -29.38% | +6.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.17% | -15.33% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 20.00% | -5.49% |
Volatility
GIL vs. BABO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gildan Activewear Inc. (GIL) is 11.24%, while YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that GIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIL | BABO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 11.95% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.26% | 24.78% | +9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.51% | 36.71% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.38% | 36.86% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 36.86% | -1.64% |
Dividends
GIL vs. BABO - Dividend Comparison
GIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than BABO's 95.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF | 95.83% | 85.50% | 20.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc. | 1.72% | 1.45% | 1.74% | 2.25% | 2.47% | 1.53% | 0.55% | 1.82% | 1.48% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIL and BABO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABO has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to GIL (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIL dropped -87.23% vs BABO's -42.63%.
GIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIL and BABO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer