PortfoliosLab logo
BABO vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BABO and BABA is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

BABO vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.31%
49.77%
BABO
BABA

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

BABO:

39.81%

BABA:

46.33%

Max Drawdown

BABO:

-29.26%

BABA:

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

BABO:

-18.99%

BABA:

-61.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABO achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 41.86% return.


BABO

YTD

20.42%

1M

-12.30%

6M

8.15%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BABA

YTD

41.86%

1M

-9.04%

6M

23.47%

1Y

61.50%

5Y*

-9.69%

10Y*

3.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BABO vs. BABA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABO

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BABO vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

BABO vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.64%, more than BABA's 0.55% yield.


TTM20242023
BABO
YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF
46.64%20.65%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.55%0.78%1.29%

Drawdowns

BABO vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -29.26%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-18.99%
-18.49%
BABO
BABA

Volatility

BABO vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) is 18.09%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 20.26%. This indicates that BABO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
18.09%
20.26%
BABO
BABA