PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GII vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GII vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 34.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 8.29%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.


GII

1D
0.54%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
8.32%
6M
8.21%
1Y
15.99%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
8.29%

XLK

1D
-1.56%
1M
16.63%
YTD
34.34%
6M
33.10%
1Y
64.08%
3Y*
33.46%
5Y*
23.44%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GII vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
8.32%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
34.34%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GII and XLK is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between GII and XLK has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GII vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GII
XLK

Industrials

27.1%
0.1%

Utilities

26.5%

-

Energy

21.5%
0.2%

Financial Services

4.5%

-

Technology

2.5%
99.7%

Communication Services

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

GII
27.1%
XLK
0.1%

Utilities

GII
26.5%
XLK

-

Energy

GII
21.5%
XLK
0.2%

Financial Services

GII
4.5%
XLK

-

Technology

GII
2.5%
XLK
99.7%

Communication Services

GII
0.3%
XLK

-

Real Estate

GII
0.1%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

GII

-

XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

GII

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

GII

-

XLK

-

Healthcare

GII

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GII vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIIXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.04

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

13.55

-5.21

GII vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIIXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

3.09

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.95

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.05

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.41

-0.13

Drawdowns

GII vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIIXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.98%

-82.05%

+31.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.94%

-15.92%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-25.66%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-33.56%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-33.56%

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-2.54%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.52%

-34.95%

+23.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

4.74%

-2.82%

Volatility

GII vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 3.84%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIIXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

7.27%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

16.76%

-7.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.75%

20.86%

-10.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

24.90%

-10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

24.49%

-7.35%

GII vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GII vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than XLK's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.70%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.40%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GII and XLK have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to GII (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.62% vs 8.29% for GII. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.40% for XLK.

GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GII and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer