GII vs. GLIX
GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and GLIX (Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. GII is passively managed, while GLIX is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GLIX.
Performance
GII vs. GLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 8.32% return, which is significantly lower than GLIX's 9.30% return.
GII
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
GLIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GII vs. GLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.32% | 1.28% |
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 9.30% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GII and GLIX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GII vs. GLIX — Risk / Return Rank
GII
GLIX
GII vs. GLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GII | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GII | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.29 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
GII vs. GLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than GLIX's maximum drawdown of -7.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and GLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GII | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -7.82% | -43.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -3.80% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -2.06% | -9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility
GII vs. GLIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GII | GLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.75% | 11.94% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 11.94% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 11.94% | +5.20% |
GII vs. GLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
GII vs. GLIX - Dividend Comparison
GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than GLIX's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.70% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 1.66% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GII and GLIX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.
GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.66% for GLIX.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.96% for GLIX.
Find the right allocation for GII and GLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer