GLIX vs. PSCU
GLIX (Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF) and PSCU (Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLIX is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Lazard, while PSCU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index. GLIX is actively managed, while PSCU is passively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GLIX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCU.
Performance
GLIX vs. PSCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than PSCU's 15.15% return.
GLIX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PSCU
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- YTD
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $121.92K | $896.68K | $440.15K | |
| $63.29K | $82.57K | $74.54K |
GLIX vs. PSCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 11.70% | 0.49% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 15.15% | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIX and PSCU is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLIX vs. PSCU — Risk / Return Rank
GLIX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCU
GLIX vs. PSCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF (GLIX) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLIX | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLIX vs. PSCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIX drawdown since its inception was -7.82%, smaller than the maximum PSCU drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIX and PSCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIX | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -29.97% | +22.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -0.99% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -7.62% | +5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.30% | — |
Volatility
GLIX vs. PSCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLIX | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 15.60% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 18.42% | -6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 19.50% | -7.64% |
GLIX vs. PSCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCU's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLIX vs. PSCU - Dividend Comparison
GLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than PSCU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIX Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF | 2.03% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 0.96% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 2.69% | 1.20% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 6.93% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLIX and PSCU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCU is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCU is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GLIX.
GLIX has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.96% for PSCU.
GLIX is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while PSCU is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for GLIX and 0.29% for PSCU.
Find the right allocation for GLIX and PSCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer