PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIGL vs. PCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIGL vs. PCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIGL achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than PCL's 2.77% return.


GIGL

1D
0.06%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.13%
6M
0.93%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCL

1D
0.03%
1M
1.83%
YTD
2.77%
6M
2.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIGL vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GIGL and PCL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIGL vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Corporate Bond ETF (GIGL) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GIGL vs. PCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIGL vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGL drawdown since its inception was -3.13%, smaller than the maximum PCL drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGL and PCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIGLPCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-5.14%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.22%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-1.71%

+0.99%

Volatility

GIGL vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIGLPCLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

7.83%

-3.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.17%

7.83%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

7.83%

-3.66%

GIGL vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIGL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIGL vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison

GIGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than PCL's 5.24% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GIGL and PCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PCL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GIGL.

PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 3.75% for GIGL.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for GIGL and 0.25% for PCL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIGL and PCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer