GIGB vs. GSLC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC).

GIGB and GSLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GIGB is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2017. GSLC is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 17, 2015. Both GIGB and GSLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GIGB vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GIGB vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	-0.28%	7.58%	1.68%	8.80%	-15.80%	-1.64%	9.86%	15.05%	-2.76%	2.45%
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	-5.21%	16.17%	24.21%	25.09%	-18.71%	27.17%	19.02%	30.74%	-4.07%	11.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIGB achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's -5.21% return.

GIGB

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: -0.28%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 4.87%
• 3Y*: 4.47%
• 5Y*: 0.52%
• 10Y*: —

GSLC

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: -5.21%
• 6M: -3.45%
• 1Y: 14.87%
• 3Y*: 16.91%
• 5Y*: 10.77%
• 10Y*: 13.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIGB vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GIGB

Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

GSLC

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

Return for Risk

GIGB vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIGB

GIGB Risk / Return Rank: 52
GIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 54

GSLC

GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 54
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIGB vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIGB	GSLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	0.82	+0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	1.29	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.19	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.27	+0.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	5.79	-0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIGB vs. GSLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the GSLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIGB and GSLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIGB	GSLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	0.82	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.65	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.74	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between GIGB and GSLC is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GIGB vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison

GIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than GSLC's 1.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.70%	4.69%	4.45%	3.67%	3.12%	2.25%	2.62%	3.22%	3.31%	1.55%	0.00%	0.00%
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	1.06%	1.00%	1.11%	1.38%	1.61%	1.06%	1.35%	1.54%	1.89%	1.69%	1.69%	0.36%

Drawdowns

GIGB vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and GSLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIGB	GSLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-33.69%	+11.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.92%	-12.27%	+9.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.25%	-24.90%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.89%	-6.89%	+5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-4.45%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	2.69%	-1.72%

Volatility

GIGB vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) is 2.13%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that GIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIGB	GSLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	5.29%	-3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.95%	9.35%	-6.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.54%	18.16%	-12.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.27%	16.64%	-9.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.72%	17.67%	-9.95%