PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GIGB vs. FDHY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GIGBFDHY
YTD Return-2.30%1.60%
1Y Return1.70%8.87%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.94%1.16%
5Y Return (Ann)1.00%4.43%
Sharpe Ratio0.251.56
Daily Std Dev7.40%5.82%
Max Drawdown-22.25%-20.01%
Current Drawdown-12.06%-0.21%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between GIGB and FDHY is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GIGB vs. FDHY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GIGB achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly lower than FDHY's 1.60% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.86%
33.00%
GIGB
FDHY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF

GIGB vs. FDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FDHY's 0.45% expense ratio.


FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
Expense ratio chart for FDHY: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%
Expense ratio chart for GIGB: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIGB vs. FDHY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIGB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIGB, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIGB, currently valued at 0.43, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.000.43
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GIGB, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIGB, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.000.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GIGB, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.75
FDHY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDHY, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.56
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDHY, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.44
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FDHY, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDHY, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.000.92
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FDHY, currently valued at 8.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.008.53

GIGB vs. FDHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the FDHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GIGB and FDHY.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.25
1.56
GIGB
FDHY

Dividends

GIGB vs. FDHY - Dividend Comparison

GIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than FDHY's 6.54% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
GIGB
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.04%3.67%3.12%2.25%2.62%3.22%3.31%1.55%
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
6.54%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%3.07%0.00%

Drawdowns

GIGB vs. FDHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than FDHY's maximum drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and FDHY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-12.06%
-0.21%
GIGB
FDHY

Volatility

GIGB vs. FDHY - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) at 1.56%. This indicates that GIGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.08%
1.56%
GIGB
FDHY