GIGB vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
GIGB and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GIGB is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2017. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both GIGB and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GIGB or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between GIGB and BND is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GIGB vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GIGB:
1.11
BND:
1.00
GIGB:
1.68
BND:
1.46
GIGB:
1.20
BND:
1.17
GIGB:
0.51
BND:
0.41
GIGB:
3.90
BND:
3.06
GIGB:
1.72%
BND:
1.82%
GIGB:
6.04%
BND:
5.55%
GIGB:
-22.25%
BND:
-18.84%
GIGB:
-6.28%
BND:
-7.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGB achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 3.28% return.
GIGB
4.11%
0.79%
5.18%
7.20%
0.61%
N/A
BND
3.28%
0.85%
4.52%
6.07%
-0.06%
1.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIGB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GIGB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GIGB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
GIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than BND's 3.56% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.27% | 3.67% | 3.12% | 2.26% | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.31% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.56% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
GIGB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GIGB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.40%. This indicates that GIGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.