GIGB vs. BND

In the year-to-date period, GIGB achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 1.86% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GIGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIGB and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GIGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%.

The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.55%. This indicates that GIGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.