GIGB vs. AUCP.L
GIGB (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and AUCP.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIGB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while AUCP.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the STOXX Global Gold Miners. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GIGB returned 0.31%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for AUCP.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIGB charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AUCP.L.
Performance
GIGB vs. AUCP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GIGB is traded in USD, while AUCP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AUCP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGB achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than AUCP.L's -8.09% return.
GIGB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
AUCP.L
- 1D
- 5.80%
- 1M
- -15.28%
- YTD
- -8.09%
- 6M
- -6.21%
- 1Y
- 49.02%
- 3Y*
- 47.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.65%
GIGB vs. AUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 7.58% | 1.68% | 8.80% | -15.80% | -1.64% | 9.86% | 15.05% | -2.76% | 2.45% |
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -8.09% | 181.76% | 18.19% | 14.43% | -14.30% | -9.74% | 21.20% | 45.13% | -10.97% | -2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGB and AUCP.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2017 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGB vs. AUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GIGB
AUCP.L
GIGB vs. AUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGB | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.43 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 3.98 | +1.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGB vs. AUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum AUCP.L drawdown of -82.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB and AUCP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGB | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -82.34% | +60.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -36.15% | +33.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.69% | -36.15% | +29.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.25% | -49.52% | +27.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -31.41% | +30.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -52.20% | +46.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 12.93% | -12.01% |
Volatility
GIGB vs. AUCP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) is 1.43%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a volatility of 15.50%. This indicates that GIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGB | AUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 15.50% | -14.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.23% | 36.95% | -33.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 46.89% | -42.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.25% | 41.52% | -34.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 37.83% | -30.17% |
GIGB vs. AUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCP.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGB vs. AUCP.L - Dividend Comparison
GIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, while AUCP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.69% | 4.45% | 3.67% | 3.12% | 2.25% | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.31% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGB and AUCP.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GIGB is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIGB is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCP.L.
GIGB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AUCP.L is Precious Metals. GIGB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, while AUCP.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GIGB and 0.55% for AUCP.L.
Find the right allocation for GIGB and AUCP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer