AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L).
AUCP.L and DFNS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUCP.L is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2008. DFNS.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2023. Both AUCP.L and DFNS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 13.69% | 161.99% | 20.20% | -6.39% |
DFNS.L VanEck Defense UCITS ETF | 15.27% | 56.23% | 46.26% | 23.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
AUCP.L is traded in GBp, while DFNS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFNS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUCP.L achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly lower than DFNS.L's 15.27% return.
AUCP.L
- 1D
- 7.36%
- 1M
- -14.10%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 111.31%
- 3Y*
- 52.03%
- 5Y*
- 29.73%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
DFNS.L
- 1D
- 6.29%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 51.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUCP.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DFNS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L — Risk / Return Rank
AUCP.L
DFNS.L
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUCP.L | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 2.02 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 2.73 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 4.01 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.67 | 9.67 | +4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUCP.L | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.02 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 2.30 | -2.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUCP.L and DFNS.L is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUCP.L nor DFNS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUCP.L drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, which is greater than DFNS.L's maximum drawdown of -12.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCP.L and DFNS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUCP.L | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.57% | -14.92% | -62.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -14.92% | -14.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -7.25% | -7.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.89% | -2.92% | -32.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 5.52% | +2.81% |
Volatility
AUCP.L vs. DFNS.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a higher volatility of 18.25% compared to VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) at 10.13%. This indicates that AUCP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUCP.L | DFNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.25% | 10.13% | +8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.86% | 19.37% | +17.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.04% | 25.32% | +19.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.57% | 20.81% | +14.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.74% | 20.81% | +13.93% |