AUCP.L vs. M9SD.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE).
AUCP.L and M9SD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUCP.L is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2008. M9SD.DE is a passively managed fund by China Post Global that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold BUGS. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both AUCP.L and M9SD.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AUCP.L or M9SD.DE.
Key characteristics
AUCP.L | M9SD.DE | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 25.06% | 22.74% |
1Y Return | 43.97% | 38.38% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 6.44% | 4.14% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 8.43% | 7.25% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 11.76% | 7.47% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.11 | 1.03 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.74 | 1.57 |
Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.19 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.00 | 0.54 |
Martin Ratio | 5.07 | 4.50 |
Ulcer Index | 8.06% | 7.18% |
Daily Std Dev | 36.57% | 31.31% |
Max Drawdown | -77.57% | -80.12% |
Current Drawdown | -16.71% | -41.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUCP.L and M9SD.DE is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AUCP.L vs. M9SD.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AUCP.L achieves a 25.06% return, which is significantly higher than M9SD.DE's 22.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AUCP.L has outperformed M9SD.DE with an annualized return of 11.76%, while M9SD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.47% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUCP.L vs. M9SD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AUCP.L and M9SD.DE have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AUCP.L vs. M9SD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AUCP.L vs. M9SD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUCP.L nor M9SD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AUCP.L vs. M9SD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUCP.L drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, roughly equal to the maximum M9SD.DE drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCP.L and M9SD.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AUCP.L vs. M9SD.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) have volatilities of 9.45% and 9.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.