GIEQ vs. GSLC
GIEQ (Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF) and GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GIEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIEQ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSLC.
Performance
GIEQ vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GIEQ
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
GIEQ vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GIEQ Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF | 2.40% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIEQ and GSLC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIEQ vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank
GIEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSLC
GIEQ vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF (GIEQ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIEQ | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIEQ vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIEQ drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIEQ and GSLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIEQ | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -33.69% | +30.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.35% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -4.38% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility
GIEQ vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIEQ | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 12.24% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 16.72% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 17.68% | -1.66% |
GIEQ vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIEQ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIEQ vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison
GIEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIEQ Goldman Sachs Data Enhanced International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIEQ and GSLC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSLC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSLC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GIEQ.
GSLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for GIEQ.
GIEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GSLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GIEQ and 0.09% for GSLC.
Find the right allocation for GIEQ and GSLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer