PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIDGX vs. GSPKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIDGX achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly higher than GSPKX's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GIDGX has underperformed GSPKX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while GSPKX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.


GIDGX

1D
0.18%
1M
4.42%
YTD
11.66%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
10.87%

GSPKX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.77%
YTD
10.45%
6M
10.93%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
11.66%15.74%20.59%17.92%-12.75%18.46%8.41%19.97%-8.26%15.18%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
10.45%13.60%29.55%21.39%-15.20%22.79%14.15%25.11%-6.29%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GIDGX and GSPKX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.93

The correlation between GIDGX and GSPKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIDGX vs. GSPKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIDGX
GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GSPKX
GSPKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GSPKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIDGXGSPKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.50

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.27

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.38

16.67

+0.71

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the GSPKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIDGX and GSPKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIDGXGSPKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.61

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.83

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.78

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.54

+0.14

Drawdowns

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIDGX drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum GSPKX drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIDGX and GSPKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIDGXGSPKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-51.90%

+20.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.14%

-7.83%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-20.51%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-22.34%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.63%

-32.70%

+1.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-6.00%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

1.53%

-0.05%

Volatility

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GSPKX) at 1.99%. This indicates that GIDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSPKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIDGXGSPKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

1.99%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

7.75%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

9.82%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.99%

15.99%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

16.90%

-2.74%

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIDGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than GSPKX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIDGX vs. GSPKX - Dividend Comparison

GIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, less than GSPKX's 5.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
5.53%5.92%12.06%4.32%8.89%8.41%1.99%4.85%5.67%3.35%2.97%3.21%
GSPKX
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
5.98%6.32%12.77%6.48%6.33%6.01%7.19%6.86%7.95%6.13%5.63%6.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, GIDGX and GSPKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GIDGX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to GSPKX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIDGX dropped -31.63% vs GSPKX's -51.90%.

GIDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIDGX and GSPKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer