GIDGX vs. FMIEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX).
GIDGX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 29, 2008. FMIEX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Sep 25, 1996.
Performance
GIDGX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIDGX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | -0.77% | 15.74% | 20.59% | 17.92% | -12.75% | 18.46% | 8.41% | 19.97% | -8.26% | 15.18% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 7.66% | 30.93% | 8.66% | 5.67% | -0.12% | 25.11% | 2.04% | 17.27% | -5.67% | 11.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIDGX achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than FMIEX's 7.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GIDGX has underperformed FMIEX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while FMIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.
GIDGX
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
FMIEX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GIDGX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIDGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GIDGX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank
GIDGX
FMIEX
GIDGX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIDGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 2.22 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.97 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.83 | -1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 13.12 | -6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIDGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.22 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.93 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.71 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.59 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIDGX and FMIEX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GIDGX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison
GIDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.22%, more than FMIEX's 4.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 6.22% | 5.92% | 12.06% | 4.32% | 8.89% | 8.41% | 1.99% | 4.85% | 5.67% | 3.35% | 2.97% | 3.21% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 4.88% | 5.76% | 9.02% | 3.27% | 8.54% | 4.34% | 1.74% | 3.82% | 18.46% | 16.45% | 5.16% | 11.75% |
Drawdowns
GIDGX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIDGX drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIDGX and FMIEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIDGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -49.85% | +18.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -9.34% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -18.63% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.63% | -39.33% | +7.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -4.40% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -6.61% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.06% | +0.14% |
Volatility
GIDGX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 3.91%. This indicates that GIDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIDGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 3.91% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.79% | 6.85% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 11.87% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 12.77% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 15.73% | -1.57% |