GICPX vs. MFWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX).
GICPX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Feb 6, 1994. MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
GICPX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GICPX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | -10.61% | 13.90% | 26.70% | 34.47% | -37.45% | 21.09% | 35.45% | 30.76% | -2.73% | 29.02% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | -0.47% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GICPX achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly lower than MFWIX's -0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GICPX has outperformed MFWIX with an annualized return of 11.62%, while MFWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.
GICPX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- -9.77%
- 1Y
- 6.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
MFWIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GICPX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GICPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GICPX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank
GICPX
MFWIX
GICPX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GICPX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.29 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 1.77 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.59 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 6.26 | -4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GICPX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.29 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.52 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between GICPX and MFWIX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GICPX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison
GICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.50%, more than MFWIX's 8.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | 15.50% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.18% | 4.21% | 2.37% | 10.11% | 8.42% | 3.16% | 7.08% | 5.73% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.81% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
GICPX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GICPX drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICPX and MFWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GICPX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -33.01% | -39.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -6.85% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -20.22% | -23.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.93% | -23.36% | -20.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.45% | -6.50% | -5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.23% | -3.83% | -18.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 1.74% | +1.40% |
Volatility
GICPX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 3.04%. This indicates that GICPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GICPX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 3.04% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | 5.25% | +4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.82% | 8.85% | +7.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 9.09% | +13.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 9.60% | +11.10% |