PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GICPX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GICPX and FBGRX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

GICPX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.54%
8.61%
GICPX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GICPX:

1.34

FBGRX:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

GICPX:

1.84

FBGRX:

1.76

Omega Ratio

GICPX:

1.24

FBGRX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

GICPX:

1.49

FBGRX:

1.78

Martin Ratio

GICPX:

7.26

FBGRX:

5.38

Ulcer Index

GICPX:

3.20%

FBGRX:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

GICPX:

17.33%

FBGRX:

20.85%

Max Drawdown

GICPX:

-74.90%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

GICPX:

-0.40%

FBGRX:

-0.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GICPX achieves a 6.85% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 4.25% return. Over the past 10 years, GICPX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 7.23%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


GICPX

YTD

6.85%

1M

3.84%

6M

9.54%

1Y

21.61%

5Y*

10.24%

10Y*

7.23%

FBGRX

YTD

4.25%

1M

2.26%

6M

8.61%

1Y

25.31%

5Y*

14.56%

10Y*

13.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GICPX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GICPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


GICPX
Gabelli Global Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for GICPX: current value at 0.90% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.90%
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GICPX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GICPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GICPX is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GICPX is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GICPX is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GICPX is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GICPX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GICPX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GICPX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GICPX, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.341.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for GICPX, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.841.76
The chart of Omega ratio for GICPX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.241.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for GICPX, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.491.78
The chart of Martin ratio for GICPX, currently valued at 7.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.007.265.38
GICPX
FBGRX

The current GICPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GICPX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.34
1.29
GICPX
FBGRX

Dividends

GICPX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

GICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than FBGRX's 0.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GICPX
Gabelli Global Growth Fund
0.17%0.18%0.30%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.50%0.07%0.39%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.22%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

GICPX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GICPX drawdown since its inception was -74.90%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICPX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.40%
-0.64%
GICPX
FBGRX

Volatility

GICPX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) is 5.10%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that GICPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.10%
6.43%
GICPX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab