GICPX vs. GABGX
GICPX (Gabelli Global Growth Fund) and GABGX (Gabelli Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - GICPX is a Global Equities fund managed by Gabelli, while GABGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Gabelli. Over the past 10 years, GICPX returned 13.28%/yr vs 16.39%/yr for GABGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GICPX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for GABGX.
Performance
GICPX vs. GABGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GICPX achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than GABGX's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GICPX has underperformed GABGX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while GABGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.
GICPX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
GABGX
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -1.68%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 14.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 16.39%
GICPX vs. GABGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | 2.72% | 13.90% | 26.70% | 34.47% | -37.45% | 21.09% | 35.45% | 30.76% | -2.73% | 29.02% |
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund | 1.78% | 18.67% | 35.38% | 45.39% | -39.04% | 22.48% | 39.11% | 34.19% | 1.89% | 29.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GICPX and GABGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995 | 0.87 |
The correlation between GICPX and GABGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GICPX vs. GABGX — Risk / Return Rank
GICPX
GABGX
GICPX vs. GABGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GICPX | GABGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.87 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 2.94 | +0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GICPX vs. GABGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GICPX drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than GABGX's maximum drawdown of -66.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICPX and GABGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GICPX | GABGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -66.39% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -16.53% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -22.39% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -42.36% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.93% | -42.36% | -1.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -4.92% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.09% | -16.67% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 4.88% | -1.72% |
Volatility
GICPX vs. GABGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) is 5.16%, while Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that GICPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GICPX | GABGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 5.92% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 13.09% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 16.26% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 23.54% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 22.56% | -1.76% |
GICPX vs. GABGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GICPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than GABGX's 1.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
GICPX vs. GABGX - Dividend Comparison
GICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.49%, more than GABGX's 5.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund | 5.39% | 5.49% | 6.27% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 5.03% | 7.02% | 11.48% | 5.66% | 6.28% | 5.17% | 8.19% |
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | 13.49% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.18% | 4.21% | 2.37% | 10.11% | 8.42% | 3.16% | 7.08% | 5.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GICPX and GABGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GABGX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to GICPX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GICPX dropped -72.92% vs GABGX's -66.39%.
GABGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GICPX and GABGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer