GICPX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
GICPX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Feb 6, 1994. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
GICPX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GICPX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | -7.56% | 13.90% | 26.70% | 34.47% | -37.45% | 21.09% | 35.45% | 30.76% | -2.73% | 29.02% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GICPX achieves a -7.56% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GICPX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
GICPX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- -7.56%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- 1Y
- 9.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GICPX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GICPX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GICPX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
GICPX
FGIAX
GICPX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GICPX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.79 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 2.30 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 2.73 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | 12.62 | -9.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GICPX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.79 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.80 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GICPX and FGIAX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GICPX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
GICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.99%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICPX Gabelli Global Growth Fund | 14.99% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 0.18% | 4.21% | 2.37% | 10.11% | 8.42% | 3.16% | 7.08% | 5.73% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
GICPX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GICPX drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICPX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GICPX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -49.35% | -23.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | -8.29% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.93% | -21.08% | -22.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.93% | -38.02% | -5.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -3.06% | -6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.23% | -7.22% | -15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.79% | +1.31% |
Volatility
GICPX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Global Growth Fund (GICPX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that GICPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GICPX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 4.15% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 7.07% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.12% | 12.28% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 13.08% | +9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 15.17% | +5.56% |