PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIB vs. ATAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GIB vs. ATAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CGI Inc (GIB) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIB achieves a -20.45% return, which is significantly lower than ATAT's -11.46% return.


GIB

1D
-0.12%
1M
11.73%
6M
-14.41%
YTD
-20.45%
1Y
-23.67%
3Y*
-9.95%
5Y*
-4.08%
10Y*
4.25%
ALL TIME*
9.36%

ATAT

1D
0.26%
1M
4.44%
6M
-2.40%
YTD
-11.46%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.26M$28.42M$34.53M
$41.80M$36.08M$33.67M

GIB vs. ATAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GIB
CGI Inc
-20.45%-15.19%2.07%24.47%0.78%
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
-11.46%49.78%58.43%-2.92%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GIB and ATAT is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIB:

$15.64B

ATAT:

$4.74B

EPS

GIB:

CA$7.71

ATAT:

CN¥13.16

PE Ratio

GIB:

13.29

ATAT:

17.61

PEG Ratio

GIB:

1.67

ATAT:

0.11

PS Ratio

GIB:

1.36

ATAT:

3.03

PB Ratio

GIB:

2.18

ATAT:

8.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIB:

CA$16.35B

ATAT:

CN¥10.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIB:

CA$3.35B

ATAT:

CN¥4.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIB:

CA$2.98B

ATAT:

CN¥2.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIB vs. ATAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIB
GIB Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
GIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIB Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ATAT
ATAT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ATAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ATAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATAT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIB vs. ATAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGI Inc (GIB) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIBATATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.05

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

0.15

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

0.31

-1.47

GIB vs. ATAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIB Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the ATAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIB and ATAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIB vs. ATAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIB drawdown since its inception was -86.78%, which is greater than ATAT's maximum drawdown of -46.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIB and ATAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIBATATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.78%

-46.91%

-39.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.77%

-26.49%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.54%

-30.96%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.76%

-18.67%

-21.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-20.18%

-12.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.44%

13.02%

+7.42%

Volatility

GIB vs. ATAT - Volatility Comparison

CGI Inc (GIB) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) have volatilities of 10.64% and 10.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIBATATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.64%

10.43%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.97%

27.47%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.79%

38.63%

-7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

58.26%

-34.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.76%

58.26%

-35.50%

Dividends

GIB vs. ATAT - Dividend Comparison

GIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than ATAT's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
2.62%1.98%1.67%0.86%
GIB
CGI Inc
0.65%0.48%0.10%0.00%

Financials

GIB vs. ATAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGI Inc and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GIB vs. ATAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CGI Inc and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a gross profit of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.

ATAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.16B and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

GIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported an operating income of 684.28M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

ATAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 568.24M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

GIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CGI Inc reported a net income of 445.87M and revenue of 4.17B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

ATAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 460.55M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GIB and ATAT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIB has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to ATAT (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIB dropped -86.78% vs ATAT's -46.91%.

ATAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIB and ATAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer