GHTA vs. THRV

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.

Performance

GHTA vs. THRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.81% return.

GHTA

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 2.06%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 8.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

THRV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHTA vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	2.12%	-0.32%
THRV Prospera Income ETF	1.81%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GHTA and THRV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

GHTA vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHTA

GHTA Risk / Return Rank: 20
GHTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
GHTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GHTA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
GHTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GHTA Martin Ratio Rank: 20

THRV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHTA vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GHTA	THRV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	—	—

Drawdowns

GHTA vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and THRV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GHTA	THRV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	-1.50%	-12.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-0.57%	-2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-0.45%	-3.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GHTA	THRV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.87%	2.94%	+4.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.89%	2.94%	+8.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.89%	2.94%	+8.95%

GHTA vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

GHTA vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison

GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than THRV's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	3.76%	3.84%	2.46%	2.32%	0.38%	0.41%
THRV Prospera Income ETF	5.40%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GHTA and THRV in my portfolio?

GHTA and THRV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GHTA or THRV?

On fees, GHTA is cheaper at 1.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GHTA or THRV?

GHTA is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GHTA or THRV?

THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 3.76% for GHTA.

What is the main difference between GHTA and THRV?

They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 1.80% for THRV.