GHTA vs. THRV
GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
GHTA vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHTA achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 2.04% return.
GHTA
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHTA vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 2.24% | 0.03% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 2.04% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHTA and THRV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHTA vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
GHTA
THRV
GHTA vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GHTA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GHTA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.13 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
GHTA vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHTA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -1.50% | -12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -0.34% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -0.44% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | — | — |
Volatility
GHTA vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHTA | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.11% | 2.92% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 2.92% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 2.92% | +9.02% |
GHTA vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
GHTA vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than THRV's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | 3.75% | 3.84% | 2.46% | 2.32% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.70% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GHTA and THRV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GHTA is cheaper at 1.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GHTA is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 3.75% for GHTA.
They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for GHTA and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer