GHTA vs. SPLS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GHTA (Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF) and SPLS (PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GHTA charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SPLS.

Performance

GHTA vs. SPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GHTA

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 6.74%
• 3Y*: 9.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPLS

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GHTA vs. SPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	-0.51%
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF	9.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GHTA and SPLS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026	0.57

Return for Risk

GHTA vs. SPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GHTA

GHTA Risk / Return Rank: 24
GHTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
GHTA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GHTA vs. SPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF (GHTA) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GHTA	SPLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GHTA	SPLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	1.88	-1.29

Drawdowns

GHTA vs. SPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GHTA drawdown since its inception was -13.92%, which is greater than SPLS's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHTA and SPLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GHTA	SPLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	-9.24%	-4.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-0.31%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.51%	-1.84%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GHTA	SPLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.11%	14.94%	-6.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.94%	14.94%	-3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.94%	14.94%	-3.00%

GHTA vs. SPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GHTA has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLS's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

GHTA vs. SPLS - Dividend Comparison

GHTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than SPLS's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GHTA Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF	3.75%	3.84%	2.46%	2.32%	0.38%	0.41%
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GHTA and SPLS in my portfolio?

GHTA and SPLS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GHTA or SPLS?

On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GHTA or SPLS?

SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for GHTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GHTA or SPLS?

GHTA has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.

What is the main difference between GHTA and SPLS?

They also come from different issuers: Goose Hollow and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for GHTA and 0.18% for SPLS.