GHM vs. MAMA
GHM (Graham Corporation) and MAMA (Mama's Creations Inc.) are both stocks. GHM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while MAMA operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, GHM returned 20.77%/yr vs 35.78%/yr for MAMA. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GHM vs. MAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GHM achieves a 61.75% return, which is significantly higher than MAMA's 10.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GHM has underperformed MAMA with an annualized return of 20.77%, while MAMA has yielded a comparatively higher 35.78% annualized return.
GHM
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 61.75%
- 6M
- 65.04%
- 1Y
- 121.09%
- 3Y*
- 99.93%
- 5Y*
- 49.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.77%
MAMA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 87.31%
- 3Y*
- 75.68%
- 5Y*
- 38.65%
- 10Y*
- 35.78%
GHM vs. MAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 61.75% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 10.53% | 69.47% | 62.12% | 173.54% | -10.70% | 12.29% | 47.93% | 75.36% | -46.92% | 80.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GHM and MAMA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2014 | 0.11 |
The correlation between GHM and MAMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GHM:
$1.16B
MAMA:
$645.92M
GHM:
$1.12
MAMA:
$0.15
GHM:
92.39
MAMA:
101.52
GHM:
0.31
MAMA:
3.00
GHM:
4.71
MAMA:
3.28
GHM:
8.25
MAMA:
11.67
GHM:
$245.29M
MAMA:
$189.23M
GHM:
$57.75M
MAMA:
$46.29M
GHM:
$14.76M
MAMA:
$11.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GHM vs. MAMA — Risk / Return Rank
GHM
MAMA
GHM vs. MAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graham Corporation (GHM) and Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GHM | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.69 | 3.65 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.23 | 9.06 | +7.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GHM vs. MAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GHM drawdown since its inception was -86.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MAMA drawdown of -89.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GHM and MAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GHM | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.11% | -89.83% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.21% | -24.05% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.46% | -42.54% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.16% | -68.85% | +15.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.83% | -79.35% | +4.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.77% | -14.21% | +10.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -45.79% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 9.67% | -2.18% |
Volatility
GHM vs. MAMA - Volatility Comparison
Graham Corporation (GHM) and Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) have volatilities of 19.90% and 19.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GHM | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.90% | 19.32% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.23% | 33.09% | +6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.36% | 52.50% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 57.99% | -8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.21% | 81.61% | -36.40% |
Dividends
GHM vs. MAMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither GHM nor MAMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GHM vs. MAMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graham Corporation and Mama's Creations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GHM vs. MAMA - Profitability Comparison
GHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.69M and revenue of 67.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
MAMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
GHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of 1.72M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.6%.
MAMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
GHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 1.97M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
MAMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GHM and MAMA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (19.90%) compared to MAMA (19.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GHM dropped -86.11% vs MAMA's -89.83%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GHM and MAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer