GH vs. VGT
GH (Guardant Health, Inc.) is a stock, while VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Over the past 5 years, GH returned 1.54%/yr vs 22.23%/yr for VGT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GH vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GH achieves a 24.37% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
GH
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 39.33%
- YTD
- 24.37%
- 6M
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 177.42%
- 3Y*
- 57.70%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
GH vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GH Guardant Health, Inc. | 24.37% | 234.34% | 12.94% | -0.55% | -72.81% | -22.39% | 64.93% | 107.87% | 16.74% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | -16.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GH and VGT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GH and VGT has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GH vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
GH
VGT
GH vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.47 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.41 | 3.69 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 11.77 | +1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.09 | 2.95 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.89 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.68 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
GH vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GH drawdown since its inception was -91.03%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GH and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.03% | -54.63% | -36.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.98% | -16.40% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.79% | -27.23% | -32.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.84% | -35.07% | -52.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.07% | -1.48% | -27.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.68% | -7.95% | -43.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.26% | 5.13% | +8.13% |
Volatility
GH vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that GH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GH | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.85% | 6.39% | +12.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.92% | 16.07% | +21.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.38% | 20.57% | +37.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.65% | 25.18% | +42.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.13% | 24.60% | +43.53% |
Dividends
GH vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
GH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GH Guardant Health, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GH and VGT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GH has higher volatility (18.85%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GH dropped -91.03% vs VGT's -54.63%.
GH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GH and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer