GGRW vs. BIBL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL).

GGRW and BIBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGRW is an actively managed fund by GAMCO Investors, Inc.. It was launched on Feb 16, 2021. BIBL is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2017.

Performance

GGRW vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GGRW vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF	-6.65%	18.29%	41.78%	42.19%	-43.92%	5.40%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	6.10%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	20.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRW achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 6.10% return.

GGRW

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -6.65%
• 6M: -6.45%
• 1Y: 16.38%
• 3Y*: 24.77%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: —

BIBL

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: 6.10%
• 6M: 7.52%
• 1Y: 25.37%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRW vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRW has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

GGRW

Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF

BIBL

Inspire 100 ETF

Return for Risk

GGRW vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRW

GGRW Risk / Return Rank: 44
GGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 47

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 70
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRW vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGRW	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.25	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.78	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.26	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.84	-0.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.82	8.69	-3.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRW vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRW and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGRW	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	1.25	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.43	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.54	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between GGRW and BIBL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GGRW vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

GGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than BIBL's 1.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGRW Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF	0.46%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	1.11%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%

Drawdowns

GGRW vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRW drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than BIBL's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRW and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGRW	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.28%	-36.12%	-14.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.19%	-13.93%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.28%	-30.85%	-19.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.13%	-4.96%	-4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.91%	-7.17%	-10.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	2.95%	+0.62%

Volatility

GGRW vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 6.64% and 6.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGRW	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	6.82%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.56%	12.28%	-0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	20.39%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.47%	19.44%	+6.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.77%	21.15%	+4.62%