PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGRA.L vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGRA.L vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GGRA.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGRA.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRA.L returned 8.02%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for DGRO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGRA.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.64% return.

GGRA.L

1D
0.16%
1M
3.46%
YTD
5.13%
6M
6.21%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
—

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc		5.13%16.19%8.94%18.40%-13.65%19.40%16.48%34.97%-11.18%29.07%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		9.64%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRA.L and DGRO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.52

The correlation between GGRA.L and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GGRA.L
DGRO

Technology

21.6%
19.4%

Industrials

18.8%
10.8%

Healthcare

15.7%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
5.7%

Communication Services

8.6%
0.1%

Financial Services

8.4%
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
11.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
2.5%

Utilities

0.4%
6.9%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Energy

0.0%
5.6%

Technology

GGRA.L
21.6%
DGRO
19.4%

Industrials

GGRA.L
18.8%
DGRO
10.8%

Healthcare

GGRA.L
15.7%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GGRA.L
15.4%
DGRO
5.7%

Communication Services

GGRA.L
8.6%
DGRO
0.1%

Financial Services

GGRA.L
8.4%
DGRO
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

GGRA.L
7.2%
DGRO
11.5%

Basic Materials

GGRA.L
3.7%
DGRO
2.5%

Utilities

GGRA.L
0.4%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

GGRA.L
0.2%
DGRO

-

Energy

GGRA.L
0.0%
DGRO
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

Often compared with GGRA.L:
GGRA.L vs. IWFQ.LGGRA.L vs. XMAW.LGGRA.L vs. JPGL.LGGRA.L vs. FGQD.LGGRA.L vs. DFIVGGRA.L vs. QQQGGRA.L vs. IMID.L
Often compared with DGRO:
DGRO vs. SCHDDGRO vs. VIGDGRO vs. VYMDGRO vs. VOODGRO vs. DGRWDGRO vs. DIVODGRO vs. HDV

Return for Risk

GGRA.L vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGRA.L
GGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GGRA.LDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.33
2.53

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.13
3.68

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.71

-2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

14.33

-7.95

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRA.L and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GGRA.LDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.53

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.78

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.81

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.77

+0.01

Drawdowns

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and DGRO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGRA.LDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-35.10%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-6.47%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-14.03%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-19.31%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.10%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-3.44%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.67%

+0.90%

Volatility

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that GGRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGRA.LDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

2.24%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

6.94%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

9.49%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

13.82%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

16.62%

-1.71%

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGRA.L vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

GGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF		1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GGRA.L and DGRO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRA.L.

GGRA.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. GGRA.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRA.L and 0.08% for DGRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRA.L and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer