GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L).
GGRA.L and XMAW.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGRA.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024. XMAW.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 10, 2014. Both GGRA.L and XMAW.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRA.L WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | -3.44% | 16.19% | 8.94% | 18.40% | -13.65% | 19.40% | 16.48% | 34.97% | -11.18% | 29.07% |
XMAW.L Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -2.80% | 22.45% | 18.54% | 23.03% | -19.97% | 19.60% | 15.68% | 26.48% | -9.97% | 24.04% |
Different Trading Currencies
GGRA.L is traded in USD, while XMAW.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMAW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a -3.44% return, which is significantly lower than XMAW.L's -2.80% return.
GGRA.L
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- —
XMAW.L
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -2.80%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 21.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAW.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGRA.L
XMAW.L
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRA.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.35 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 1.89 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.22 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 9.13 | -4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRA.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.35 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.61 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRA.L and XMAW.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGRA.L nor XMAW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum XMAW.L drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and XMAW.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRA.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.94% | -25.05% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -10.44% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.35% | -18.92% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -4.14% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -3.87% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 1.95% | +0.57% |
Volatility
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.L) have volatilities of 5.53% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGRA.L | XMAW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 5.61% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 9.57% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 16.08% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 15.51% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 15.85% | -0.97% |