PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L).

GGRA.L and FGQD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GGRA.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024. FGQD.L is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Global Quality Income index. It was launched on Mar 27, 2017. Both GGRA.L and FGQD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc		-4.07%16.19%8.94%18.40%-13.65%19.40%16.48%34.97%-11.18%20.33%
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF		0.43%20.21%11.33%17.39%-10.91%22.66%9.68%28.80%-7.39%16.06%
Different Trading Currencies

GGRA.L is traded in USD, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRA.L achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than FGQD.L's 0.43% return.

GGRA.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-4.07%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
11.21%
3Y*
10.74%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
—

FGQD.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
0.43%
6M
3.32%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc

Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF

Often compared with GGRA.L:
GGRA.L vs. XMAW.LGGRA.L vs. IWFQ.LGGRA.L vs. JPGL.LGGRA.L vs. DFIVGGRA.L vs. QQQGGRA.L vs. SCHDGGRA.L vs. IMID.L
Often compared with FGQD.L:
FGQD.L vs. GGRP.LFGQD.L vs. SCHDFGQD.L vs. IMID.LFGQD.L vs. GGRG.LFGQD.L vs. TDIV.ASFGQD.L vs. XDEB.DEFGQD.L vs. FUSD.L

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRA.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc

Return for Risk

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGRA.L
GGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GGRA.LFGQD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

1.34

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.84

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.84

-1.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.59

12.58

-6.99

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRA.L and FGQD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GGRA.LFGQD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

1.34

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.69

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.78

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between GGRA.L and FGQD.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison

GGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRA.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF		1.80%1.87%2.31%2.78%2.69%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.56%

Drawdowns

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRA.L drawdown since its inception was -30.94%, smaller than the maximum FGQD.L drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRA.L and FGQD.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

GGRA.LFGQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.94%

-26.43%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-6.93%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

-16.90%

-7.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

-3.80%

-3.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-2.94%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.62%

+0.81%

Volatility

GGRA.L vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRA.L) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) at 4.70%. This indicates that GGRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGQD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

GGRA.LFGQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

4.70%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

8.26%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

14.88%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

14.24%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

16.31%

-1.43%