GGP.L vs. REGB.L
GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) is a stock, while REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) is Precious Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Over the past 3 years, GGP.L returned 67.02%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for REGB.L. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGP.L vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGP.L is traded in GBp, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 37.64% return, which is significantly higher than REGB.L's 31.29% return.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 37.64%
- 6M
- 77.66%
- 1Y
- 145.72%
- 3Y*
- 67.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 60.56%
REGB.L
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -6.24%
- YTD
- 31.29%
- 6M
- 38.96%
- 1Y
- 162.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGP.L vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 37.64% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -0.68% |
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 31.29% | 75.67% | -34.55% | -22.78% | -22.89% | 14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and REGB.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between GGP.L and REGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
REGB.L
GGP.L vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGP.L | REGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 7.71 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 20.77 | -10.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGP.L | REGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 3.58 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.01 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, which is greater than REGB.L's maximum drawdown of -72.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and REGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | REGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.48% | -72.41% | -26.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.27% | -20.93% | -14.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.65% | -60.97% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.69% | -23.30% | +13.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.13% | -40.12% | -25.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | 7.79% | +5.78% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) have volatilities of 13.35% and 13.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | REGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 13.31% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.61% | 31.52% | +10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.83% | 45.11% | +19.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.86% | 44.61% | +20.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.93% | 44.61% | +46.32% |
Dividends
GGP.L vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GGP.L nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGP.L and REGB.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GGP.L and REGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer