GGP.L vs. NRJL.L
GGP.L (Greatland Gold plc) is a stock, while NRJL.L (Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Over the past 5 years, GGP.L returned 12.17%/yr vs 31.39%/yr for NRJL.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGP.L vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GGP.L is traded in GBp, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GGP.L having a 37.64% return and NRJL.L slightly lower at 36.32%.
GGP.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 37.64%
- 6M
- 77.66%
- 1Y
- 145.72%
- 3Y*
- 67.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 60.56%
NRJL.L
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 36.32%
- 6M
- 132.36%
- 1Y
- 205.26%
- 3Y*
- 29.93%
- 5Y*
- 31.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GGP.L vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 37.64% | 309.83% | -35.50% | 23.25% | -50.00% | -56.64% | 57.02% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 36.32% | 130.90% | -11.57% | -22.89% | 20.78% | 36.43% | 19.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGP.L and NRJL.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.11 |
The correlation between GGP.L and NRJL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGP.L vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank
GGP.L
NRJL.L
GGP.L vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGP.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 2.46 | -1.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 23.97 | -19.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 85.38 | -74.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGP.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.85 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.69 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
GGP.L vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.48%, which is greater than NRJL.L's maximum drawdown of -51.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and NRJL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGP.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.48% | -51.06% | -47.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.27% | -8.51% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.65% | -40.91% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.82% | -51.06% | -25.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.69% | -2.51% | -7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.13% | -22.13% | -43.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | 2.39% | +11.18% |
Volatility
GGP.L vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison
Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) has a higher volatility of 13.35% compared to Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) at 7.66%. This indicates that GGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGP.L | NRJL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 7.66% | +5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.61% | 54.66% | -13.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.83% | 71.66% | -6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.86% | 45.42% | +19.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.93% | 43.84% | +47.09% |
Dividends
GGP.L vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison
GGP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRJL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGP.L Greatland Gold plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRJL.L Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 30.86% | 42.07% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 23.99% | 31.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGP.L and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GGP.L and NRJL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer