GGOV vs. XHLF
GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) and XHLF (BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares, while XHLF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GGOV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for XHLF.
Performance
GGOV vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGOV achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than XHLF's 1.56% return.
GGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XHLF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGOV vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.75% | -2.80% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 1.56% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGOV and XHLF is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGOV vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank
GGOV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XHLF
GGOV vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGOV | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 10.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 96.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 639.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGOV vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGOV drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, which is greater than XHLF's maximum drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGOV and XHLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGOV | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -0.11% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | 0.00% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -0.01% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
GGOV vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGOV | XHLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.28% | 0.32% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 0.42% | +4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.28% | 0.42% | +4.86% |
GGOV vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGOV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGOV vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison
GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XHLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XHLF BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 3.84% | 3.98% | 4.96% | 4.50% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGOV and XHLF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
GGOV is categorized as Global Bonds, while XHLF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GGOV and 0.03% for XHLF.
Find the right allocation for GGOV and XHLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer