GGME vs. XLG
GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GGME returned 10.24%/yr vs 17.01%/yr for XLG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGME charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
GGME vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 10.24%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.01% annualized return.
GGME
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -3.07%
- 1Y
- -2.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
XLG
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 17.12%
- 3Y*
- 21.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- 17.01%
GGME vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | -2.63% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 7.61% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.84% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGME and XLG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.77 |
The correlation between GGME and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
GGME vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGME
XLG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GGME
XLG
Communication Services
GGME
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
GGME
XLG
Financial Services
GGME
XLG
Industrials
GGME
XLG
Basic Materials
GGME
-
XLG
Consumer Defensive
GGME
-
XLG
Energy
GGME
-
XLG
Healthcare
GGME
-
XLG
Real Estate
GGME
-
XLG
-
Utilities
GGME
-
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGME vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
GGME
XLG
GGME vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGME | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.22 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 1.39 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 4.86 | -5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGME vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGME | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -52.39% | -16.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -12.41% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -20.70% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -28.02% | -16.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.35% | -30.46% | -15.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.01% | -7.61% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -7.63% | -6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 3.53% | +7.90% |
Volatility
GGME vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.02%. This indicates that GGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGME | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 5.02% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.05% | 10.68% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.66% | 13.91% | +5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.37% | 18.79% | +5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 18.87% | +4.35% |
GGME vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGME vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than XLG's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.67% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGME and XLG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGME has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to XLG (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.01% vs 10.24% for GGME. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.01% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
GGME is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGME and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer