GGME vs. CRF

In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 7.99%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGME and CRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CRF's 17.23% yield.

The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -78.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and CRF.

The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) is 4.41%, while Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that GGME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.