GGME vs. RSP
GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GGME returned 10.01%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for RSP. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGME charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
GGME vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGME achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GGME has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 10.01%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
GGME
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -1.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
RSP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
GGME vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | -1.63% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 7.61% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.72% | 11.21% | 12.79% | 13.70% | -11.62% | 29.41% | 12.66% | 28.91% | -7.84% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGME and RSP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GGME and RSP has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GGME vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GGME
RSP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
GGME
RSP
Communication Services
GGME
RSP
Consumer Cyclical
GGME
RSP
Financial Services
GGME
RSP
Industrials
GGME
RSP
Basic Materials
GGME
-
RSP
Consumer Defensive
GGME
-
RSP
Energy
GGME
-
RSP
Healthcare
GGME
-
RSP
Real Estate
GGME
-
RSP
Utilities
GGME
-
RSP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGME vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
GGME
RSP
GGME vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGME | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.28 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.39 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 9.03 | -9.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGME vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGME drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than RSP's maximum drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGME and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGME | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.13% | -59.92% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -7.85% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -17.81% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.90% | -21.38% | -23.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.35% | -39.04% | -7.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.11% | -0.79% | -10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.52% | -6.64% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.41% | 2.08% | +9.33% |
Volatility
GGME vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.59%. This indicates that GGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGME | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 3.59% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 8.69% | +7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.78% | 11.81% | +7.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.36% | 16.20% | +8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 18.33% | +4.89% |
GGME vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGME has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGME vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
GGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than RSP's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGME and RSP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGME has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to RSP (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGME dropped -69.13% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 12.31% vs 10.01% for GGME. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GGME.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
GGME is categorized as Technology Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. GGME tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GGME and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGME and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer