GGLS vs. TMF
GGLS (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GGLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Alphabet Inc. Class A (--100%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GGLS returned -31.99%/yr vs -18.84%/yr for TMF. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. GGLS charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
GGLS vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGLS achieves a -19.25% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -15.88% return.
GGLS
- 1D
- -4.69%
- 1M
- -4.87%
- 6M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -19.25%
- 1Y
- -52.10%
- 3Y*
- -31.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -29.63%
TMF
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- 6M
- -14.16%
- YTD
- -15.88%
- 1Y
- -17.67%
- 3Y*
- -18.84%
- 5Y*
- -35.05%
- 10Y*
- -18.33%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.37M | $27.43M | $62.55M | |
| $168.22M | $133.63M | $127.70M |
GGLS vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | -19.25% | -42.64% | -26.50% | -37.72% | 19.63% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -15.88% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGLS and TMF is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGLS vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
GGLS
TMF
GGLS vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGLS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | 0.91 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.62 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | -1.25 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGLS vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGLS drawdown since its inception was -81.24%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGLS and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGLS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.24% | -93.10% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.32% | -28.69% | -24.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.64% | -50.64% | -21.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.16% | -93.04% | +12.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.15% | -44.08% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.54% | 14.21% | +25.33% |
Volatility
GGLS vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) has a higher volatility of 13.90% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.36%. This indicates that GGLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGLS | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.90% | 7.36% | +6.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.93% | 19.96% | +5.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.43% | 27.08% | +5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.76% | 46.37% | -14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.76% | 43.71% | -11.95% |
GGLS vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGLS has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
GGLS vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
GGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than TMF's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGLS Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares | 3.16% | 4.87% | 4.31% | 5.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.69% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GGLS and TMF have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGLS has higher volatility (13.90%) compared to TMF (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGLS dropped -81.24% vs TMF's -93.10%.
On 3-year performance, TMF leads with -18.84% vs -31.99% for GGLS. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TMF has performed better with a -18.84% return vs -31.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for GGLS.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 3.16% for GGLS.
GGLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. GGLS tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (--100%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.09% for GGLS and 1.01% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGLS and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer