GGG vs. CSL
GGG (Graco Inc.) and CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — GGG in Specialty Industrial Machinery, CSL in Building Products & Equipment. Over the past 10 years, GGG returned 13.99%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for CSL. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GGG vs. CSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGG achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than CSL's 13.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GGG having a 13.99% annualized return and CSL not far ahead at 14.60%.
GGG
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- -2.51%
- 3Y*
- 1.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.95%
CSL
- 1D
- -2.69%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $192.98M | $195.31M | $163.99M | |
GGG Graco Inc. | $139.07M | $112.59M | $111.19M |
GGG vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGG Graco Inc. | -2.12% | -1.46% | -1.68% | 30.62% | -15.48% | 12.56% | 40.97% | 25.94% | -6.34% | 65.60% |
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 13.20% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGG and CSL is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, GGG and CSL have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GGG:
$12.86B
CSL:
$14.56B
GGG:
$4.23
CSL:
$17.39
GGG:
18.78
CSL:
20.69
GGG:
3.69
CSL:
0.54
GGG:
4.42
CSL:
2.94
GGG:
$2.27B
CSL:
$5.10B
GGG:
$1.19B
CSL:
$865.80M
GGG:
$733.25M
CSL:
$1.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGG vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank
GGG
CSL
GGG vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graco Inc. (GGG) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GGG | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.05 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.11 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 0.18 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GGG vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGG drawdown since its inception was -68.77%, which is greater than CSL's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGG and CSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGG | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.77% | -64.56% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.55% | -25.48% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.55% | -37.72% | +15.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.98% | -37.72% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.60% | -38.68% | +8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.67% | -23.66% | +7.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -12.36% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.13% | 15.31% | -4.18% |
Volatility
GGG vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Graco Inc. (GGG) is 8.51%, while Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a volatility of 15.99%. This indicates that GGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGG | CSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 15.99% | -7.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.66% | 30.09% | -14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.53% | 39.89% | -19.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 31.93% | -9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 30.23% | -5.60% |
Dividends
GGG vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison
GGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than CSL's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.46% | 1.34% | 1.21% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 1.06% | 1.59% | 1.67% |
Financials
GGG vs. CSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graco Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GGG vs. CSL - Profitability Comparison
GGG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graco Inc. reported a gross profit of 316.94M and revenue of 590.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of -363.20M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.1%.
GGG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graco Inc. reported an operating income of 175.09M and revenue of 590.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 352.50M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
GGG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Graco Inc. reported a net income of 144.93M and revenue of 590.55M, resulting in a net margin of 24.5%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 255.20M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGG and CSL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSL has higher volatility (15.99%) compared to GGG (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGG dropped -68.77% vs CSL's -64.56%.
CSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGG and CSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer