GGG vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GGG or CW.
Correlation
The correlation between GGG and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GGG vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GGG:
0.19
CW:
2.76
GGG:
0.40
CW:
3.38
GGG:
1.05
CW:
1.49
GGG:
0.21
CW:
5.87
GGG:
0.36
CW:
17.46
GGG:
10.26%
CW:
3.83%
GGG:
19.23%
CW:
24.21%
GGG:
-68.77%
CW:
-59.19%
GGG:
-8.94%
CW:
-5.74%
Fundamentals
GGG:
$14.38B
CW:
$13.92B
GGG:
$2.84
CW:
$10.57
GGG:
29.98
CW:
34.71
GGG:
2.88
CW:
2.71
GGG:
$1.56B
CW:
$2.30B
GGG:
$843.18M
CW:
$836.12M
GGG:
$501.71M
CW:
$482.90M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGG achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 3.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GGG has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 14.57%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 19.00% annualized return.
GGG
1.34%
0.83%
3.96%
1.39%
11.63%
14.57%
CW
3.40%
3.59%
30.58%
65.17%
20.69%
19.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GGG vs. CW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GGG
CW
GGG vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GGG vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
GGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than CW's 0.23% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.22% | 1.21% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 2.65% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 2.40% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
GGG vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGG drawdown since its inception was -68.77%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGG and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GGG vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Graco Inc. (GGG) is 5.99%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that GGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GGG vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graco Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities