GGG vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GGG or CW.
Correlation
The correlation between GGG and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GGG vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GGG:
0.05
CW:
2.62
GGG:
0.20
CW:
3.23
GGG:
1.02
CW:
1.47
GGG:
0.05
CW:
5.55
GGG:
0.09
CW:
20.10
GGG:
9.89%
CW:
3.15%
GGG:
19.12%
CW:
24.19%
GGG:
-68.77%
CW:
-59.19%
GGG:
-9.69%
CW:
-9.00%
Fundamentals
GGG:
$14.56B
CW:
$13.83B
GGG:
$2.83
CW:
$10.59
GGG:
30.46
CW:
34.42
GGG:
2.91
CW:
2.71
GGG:
$2.13B
CW:
$3.08B
GGG:
$1.14B
CW:
$1.14B
GGG:
$573.71M
CW:
$680.05M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGG achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 59.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GGG has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 13.98%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.18% annualized return.
GGG
-1.19%
-4.30%
7.20%
0.05%
11.66%
13.98%
CW
59.44%
-1.94%
28.96%
62.20%
20.55%
18.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GGG vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GGG vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
GGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than CW's 0.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.20% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 2.65% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 2.40% | 1.28% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
GGG vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGG drawdown since its inception was -68.77%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGG and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GGG vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Graco Inc. (GGG) is 5.83%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that GGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GGG vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graco Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities