GGG vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GGG or CW.
Key characteristics
| GGG | CW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.78% | 73.48% |
| 1Y Return | 15.71% | 81.31% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.23% | 43.50% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.76% | 23.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.77% | 19.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.77 | 4.05 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 5.11 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.70 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.83 | 8.63 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.49 | 34.93 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.72% | 2.48% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.74% | 21.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.77% | -59.19% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.06% | -0.99% |
Fundamentals
| GGG | CW | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.04B | $14.78B |
| EPS | $2.83 | $10.59 |
| PE Ratio | 31.48 | 36.78 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.97 | 2.71 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $2.13B | $3.08B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.14B | $1.14B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $698.43M | $627.98M |
Correlation
The correlation between GGG and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GGG vs. CW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GGG achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 73.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GGG has underperformed CW with an annualized return of 14.77%, while CW has yielded a comparatively higher 19.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GGG vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GGG vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
GGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than CW's 0.21% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.16% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 2.65% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 2.40% | 1.28% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.21% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
GGG vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGG drawdown since its inception was -68.77%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGG and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GGG vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Graco Inc. (GGG) is 6.39%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that GGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GGG vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graco Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities