GGG vs. CW
Compare and contrast key facts about Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GGG or CW.
Correlation
The correlation between GGG and CW is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GGG vs. CW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GGG:
-0.56
CW:
0.33
GGG:
-0.65
CW:
0.62
GGG:
0.92
CW:
1.09
GGG:
-0.66
CW:
0.38
GGG:
-1.21
CW:
1.27
GGG:
9.59%
CW:
8.16%
GGG:
20.62%
CW:
31.05%
GGG:
-68.77%
CW:
-59.19%
GGG:
-14.20%
CW:
-27.21%
Fundamentals
GGG:
$13.49B
CW:
$11.42B
GGG:
$2.82
CW:
$10.55
GGG:
28.45
CW:
28.71
GGG:
2.55
CW:
2.71
GGG:
$1.62B
CW:
$2.41B
GGG:
$856.26M
CW:
$899.79M
GGG:
$485.35M
CW:
$538.04M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGG achieves a -4.52% return, which is significantly higher than CW's -20.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GGG having a 14.54% annualized return and CW not far ahead at 14.79%.
GGG
-4.52%
-3.74%
-6.37%
-11.85%
13.41%
14.54%
CW
-20.15%
-12.51%
-15.99%
11.10%
28.29%
14.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GGG vs. CW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GGG
CW
GGG vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Graco Inc. (GGG) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GGG vs. CW - Dividend Comparison
GGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than CW's 0.30% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGG Graco Inc. | 1.30% | 1.21% | 1.08% | 1.25% | 0.93% | 0.97% | 1.23% | 1.27% | 2.65% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 2.40% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.30% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.74% |
Drawdowns
GGG vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGG drawdown since its inception was -68.77%, which is greater than CW's maximum drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGG and CW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GGG vs. CW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Graco Inc. (GGG) is 7.19%, while Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that GGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GGG vs. CW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Graco Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities