GGBFX vs. GGBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX).
GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. GGBZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001.
Performance
GGBFX vs. GGBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GGBFX vs. GGBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | -3.27% | 19.62% | 15.45% | 20.67% | -19.61% | 14.95% | 15.47% | 26.93% | -10.15% | 25.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGBFX achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly higher than GGBZX's -3.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBFX has underperformed GGBZX with an annualized return of 1.91%, while GGBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
GGBZX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GGBFX vs. GGBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GGBFX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GGBZX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GGBFX vs. GGBZX — Risk / Return Rank
GGBFX
GGBZX
GGBFX vs. GGBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGBFX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.98 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 5.95 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGBFX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.98 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.45 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.63 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.38 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between GGBFX and GGBZX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GGBFX vs. GGBZX - Dividend Comparison
GGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than GGBZX's 11.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund | 11.96% | 11.57% | 3.37% | 3.51% | 13.16% | 7.72% | 6.01% | 12.14% | 3.94% | 7.18% | 9.55% | 27.06% |
Drawdowns
GGBFX vs. GGBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGBFX drawdown since its inception was -27.03%, smaller than the maximum GGBZX drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBFX and GGBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGBFX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.03% | -57.68% | +30.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.80% | -11.75% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -28.31% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.97% | -33.03% | +12.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -7.31% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -9.29% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 2.69% | -1.75% |
Volatility
GGBFX vs. GGBZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) is 1.76%, while GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that GGBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GGBFX | GGBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 6.24% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.63% | 9.83% | -7.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.00% | 16.64% | -12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 15.39% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.49% | 16.42% | -11.93% |