GFS vs. WOLF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) and WOLF (Wolfspeed, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GFS vs. WOLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 133.05% return, which is significantly lower than WOLF's 147.79% return.

GFS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 14.57%
• YTD: 133.05%
• 6M: 110.12%
• 1Y: 121.62%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WOLF

• 1D: -5.27%
• 1M: -30.56%
• YTD: 147.79%
• 6M: 132.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFS vs. WOLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	133.05%	-1.88%
WOLF Wolfspeed, Inc.	147.79%	-3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and WOLF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap GFS : $45.65B WOLF : $16.95B
EPS GFS : $1.39 WOLF : -$11.53
PS Ratio GFS : 6.66 WOLF : 8.31
PB Ratio GFS : 3.90 WOLF : 16.59
Total Revenue (TTM) GFS : $6.84B WOLF : $712.50M
Gross Profit (TTM) GFS : $1.81B WOLF : -$208.10M
EBITDA (TTM) GFS : $2.16B WOLF : -$1.26B

Return for Risk

GFS vs. WOLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS

GFS Risk / Return Rank: 89
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

WOLF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFS vs. WOLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFS	WOLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	—	—

Drawdowns

GFS vs. WOLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, which is greater than WOLF's maximum drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and WOLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFS	WOLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.53%	-58.22%	-3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.54%	-41.31%	+31.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-34.76%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFS	WOLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.03%	123.89%	-69.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.19%	123.89%	-72.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.19%	123.89%	-72.70%

Dividends

GFS vs. WOLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFS nor WOLF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GFS vs. WOLF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Wolfspeed, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

WOLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported a gross profit of -27.00M and revenue of 150.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -18.0%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

WOLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported an operating income of -101.30M and revenue of 150.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -67.4%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

WOLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported a net income of -119.90M and revenue of 150.20M, resulting in a net margin of -79.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFS and WOLF in my portfolio?

GFS and WOLF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.