GFS vs. POWI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) and POWI (Power Integrations, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, GFS returned 8.97%/yr vs -4.35%/yr for POWI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

GFS vs. POWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 133.05% return, which is significantly higher than POWI's 122.07% return.

GFS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 14.57%
• YTD: 133.05%
• 6M: 110.12%
• 1Y: 121.62%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POWI

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 7.28%
• YTD: 122.07%
• 6M: 116.41%
• 1Y: 44.71%
• 3Y*: -4.35%
• 5Y*: 0.58%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFS vs. POWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	133.05%	-18.62%	-29.19%	12.45%	-17.05%	38.23%
POWI Power Integrations, Inc.	122.07%	-41.33%	-23.97%	15.56%	-22.09%	-6.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and POWI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.64

The correlation between GFS and POWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap GFS : $45.65B POWI : $4.38B
EPS GFS : $1.39 POWI : $0.30
PE Ratio GFS : 58.52 POWI : 264.07
PS Ratio GFS : 6.66 POWI : 9.82
PB Ratio GFS : 3.90 POWI : 6.52
Total Revenue (TTM) GFS : $6.84B POWI : $446.28M
Gross Profit (TTM) GFS : $1.81B POWI : $240.35M
EBITDA (TTM) GFS : $2.16B POWI : $30.43M

Return for Risk

GFS vs. POWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS

GFS Risk / Return Rank: 89
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

POWI

POWI Risk / Return Rank: 63
POWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
POWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
POWI Omega Ratio Rank: 64
POWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
POWI Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFS vs. POWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFS	POWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	0.68	+1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.42	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.17	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.79	0.81	+3.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	1.59	+7.62

GFS vs. POWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the POWI Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFS and POWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GFS vs. POWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum POWI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and POWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFS	POWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.53%	-85.76%	+24.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.10%	-47.83%	+23.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.40%	-67.82%	+12.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-70.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.54%	-24.68%	+15.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-38.64%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.50%	24.20%	-11.70%

Volatility

GFS vs. POWI - Volatility Comparison

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 26.45% compared to Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) at 23.59%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFS	POWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.45%	23.59%	+2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.29%	38.72%	+6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.03%	56.89%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.19%	44.48%	+6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.19%	41.64%	+9.55%

Dividends

GFS vs. POWI - Dividend Comparison

GFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POWI Power Integrations, Inc.	1.08%	2.36%	1.31%	0.94%	1.00%	0.58%	0.51%	0.71%	1.05%	0.76%	0.77%	0.99%

Financials

GFS vs. POWI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Power Integrations, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

POWI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Integrations, Inc. reported a gross profit of 56.94M and revenue of 108.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

POWI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Integrations, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.45M and revenue of 108.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

POWI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Power Integrations, Inc. reported a net income of 3.30M and revenue of 108.31M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFS and POWI in my portfolio?

GFS and POWI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GFS or POWI?

GFS has higher volatility (26.45%) compared to POWI (23.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFS dropped -61.53% vs POWI's -85.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.