GFOF vs. QSOL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. GFOF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.

Performance

GFOF vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QSOL

• 1D: -5.21%
• 1M: -18.27%
• YTD: -43.81%
• 6M: -44.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFOF vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	-43.81%	-4.28%

Return for Risk

GFOF vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GFOF	QSOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-56.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-52.76%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFOF	QSOL	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	72.31%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	72.31%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	72.31%	—

GFOF vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFOF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFOF vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison

GFOF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GFOF or QSOL?

On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFOF or QSOL?

QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFOF or QSOL?

QSOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for GFOF.

What is the main difference between GFOF and QSOL?

GFOF is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index, while QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GFOF and 0.25% for QSOL.