PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFL vs. NOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

GFL vs. NOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFL vs. NOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GFL
GFL Environmental Inc.
-2.83%-3.44%29.26%18.24%-22.65%29.88%73.97%
NOA
North American Construction Group Ltd
-5.62%-31.98%5.16%58.49%-9.78%54.32%15.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFL:

$15.32B

NOA:

$380.66M

EPS

GFL:

$10.26

NOA:

$1.09

PE Ratio

GFL:

4.06

NOA:

12.36

PS Ratio

GFL:

2.36

NOA:

0.33

PB Ratio

GFL:

2.10

NOA:

0.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFL:

$6.62B

NOA:

$1.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFL:

$1.37B

NOA:

$161.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

GFL:

$2.07B

NOA:

$329.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFL achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly higher than NOA's -5.62% return.


GFL

1D
3.24%
1M
-5.59%
YTD
-2.83%
6M
-11.88%
1Y
-13.53%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*

NOA

1D
3.37%
1M
-18.69%
YTD
-5.62%
6M
-3.91%
1Y
-12.59%
3Y*
-5.17%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
23.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFL vs. NOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFL
GFL Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NOA
NOA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
NOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOA Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFL vs. NOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFLNOADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

-0.24

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.65

0.03

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.01

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.42

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.09

-0.80

-0.28

GFL vs. NOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFL Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the NOA Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFL and NOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFLNOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

-0.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.13

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.00

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between GFL and NOA is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GFL vs. NOA - Dividend Comparison

GFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than NOA's 2.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFL
GFL Environmental Inc.
0.15%0.14%0.12%0.15%0.16%0.11%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOA
North American Construction Group Ltd
2.57%2.39%1.42%1.54%1.84%0.85%1.21%0.74%0.73%1.62%2.08%4.62%

Drawdowns

GFL vs. NOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFL drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, smaller than the maximum NOA drawdown of -93.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFL and NOA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFLNOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-93.59%

+50.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.39%

-32.31%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.76%

-50.67%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.03%

-44.71%

+25.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-55.82%

+41.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

17.04%

-5.52%

Volatility

GFL vs. NOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) is 8.47%, while North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a volatility of 34.87%. This indicates that GFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFLNOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

34.87%

-26.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.97%

41.93%

-24.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.60%

51.99%

-26.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.55%

42.50%

-12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

46.21%

-13.33%

Financials

GFL vs. NOA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GFL Environmental Inc. and North American Construction Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.69B
305.33M
(GFL) Total Revenue
(NOA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GFL vs. NOA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GFL Environmental Inc. and North American Construction Group Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
20.0%
12.6%
Portfolio components
GFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GFL Environmental Inc. reported a gross profit of 337.60M and revenue of 1.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

NOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 38.31M and revenue of 305.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

GFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GFL Environmental Inc. reported an operating income of 82.90M and revenue of 1.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

NOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported an operating income of 21.21M and revenue of 305.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

GFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GFL Environmental Inc. reported a net income of 33.90M and revenue of 1.69B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

NOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a net income of 124.90K and revenue of 305.33M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.