PortfoliosLab logo
NOA vs. EXC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NOA and EXC is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NOA vs. EXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Exelon Corporation (EXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NOA:

-0.59

EXC:

1.18

Sortino Ratio

NOA:

-0.61

EXC:

1.77

Omega Ratio

NOA:

0.92

EXC:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

NOA:

-0.47

EXC:

0.92

Martin Ratio

NOA:

-1.37

EXC:

4.93

Ulcer Index

NOA:

15.80%

EXC:

4.88%

Daily Std Dev

NOA:

38.91%

EXC:

19.38%

Max Drawdown

NOA:

-93.62%

EXC:

-62.27%

Current Drawdown

NOA:

-36.78%

EXC:

-4.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NOA:

$471.94M

EXC:

$45.64B

EPS

NOA:

$1.10

EXC:

$2.69

PE Ratio

NOA:

14.35

EXC:

16.81

PEG Ratio

NOA:

4.82

EXC:

2.18

PS Ratio

NOA:

0.40

EXC:

1.93

PB Ratio

NOA:

1.68

EXC:

1.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOA:

$868.76M

EXC:

$23.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOA:

$156.76M

EXC:

$8.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOA:

$214.51M

EXC:

$8.60B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOA achieves a -26.60% return, which is significantly lower than EXC's 21.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NOA has outperformed EXC with an annualized return of 20.72%, while EXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.


NOA

YTD

-26.60%

1M

14.76%

6M

-22.96%

1Y

-22.00%

5Y*

25.69%

10Y*

20.72%

EXC

YTD

21.23%

1M

0.20%

6M

19.73%

1Y

23.61%

5Y*

15.33%

10Y*

10.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NOA vs. EXC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NOA is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NOA is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NOA is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NOA is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NOA is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NOA is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EXC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EXC is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EXC is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EXC is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EXC is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EXC is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EXC is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NOA vs. EXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Exelon Corporation (EXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NOA Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the EXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOA and EXC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NOA vs. EXC - Dividend Comparison

NOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than EXC's 2.57% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NOA
North American Construction Group Ltd
2.00%1.42%1.42%1.84%0.85%1.21%0.91%0.69%1.66%2.08%4.34%2.29%
EXC
Exelon Corporation
2.57%4.04%4.01%3.13%2.65%3.63%3.18%3.06%3.33%3.56%4.47%3.34%

Drawdowns

NOA vs. EXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOA drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, which is greater than EXC's maximum drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOA and EXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NOA vs. EXC - Volatility Comparison

North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to Exelon Corporation (EXC) at 6.22%. This indicates that NOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NOA vs. EXC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North American Construction Group Ltd and Exelon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
305.59M
6.71B
(NOA) Total Revenue
(EXC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NOA vs. EXC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between North American Construction Group Ltd and Exelon Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
13.7%
42.4%
(NOA) Gross Margin
(EXC) Gross Margin
NOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 41.99M and revenue of 305.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.7%.

EXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Exelon Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.85B and revenue of 6.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.4%.

NOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North American Construction Group Ltd reported an operating income of 22.54M and revenue of 305.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

EXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Exelon Corporation reported an operating income of 1.54B and revenue of 6.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.9%.

NOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a net income of 4.81M and revenue of 305.59M, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

EXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Exelon Corporation reported a net income of 908.00M and revenue of 6.71B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.