NOA vs. EXC
NOA (North American Construction Group Ltd) and EXC (Exelon Corporation) are both stocks. NOA operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while EXC operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, NOA returned 20.25%/yr vs 9.62%/yr for EXC. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NOA vs. EXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOA achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than EXC's 7.01% return. Over the past 10 years, NOA has outperformed EXC with an annualized return of 20.25%, while EXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.62% annualized return.
NOA
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- YTD
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- -6.67%
- 3Y*
- -16.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 20.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.48%
EXC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- 6M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $454.24M | $436.53M | $409.53M | |
| $634.03K | $742.97K | $1.48M |
NOA vs. EXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd | -4.18% | -31.98% | 5.16% | 58.49% | -9.78% | 54.32% | -17.24% | 37.27% | 81.63% | 30.91% |
EXC Exelon Corporation | 7.01% | 20.02% | 10.29% | -13.96% | 8.29% | 41.48% | -3.87% | 4.27% | 18.33% | 15.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOA and EXC is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2006 | 0.17 |
The correlation between NOA and EXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (3 years) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NOA:
$368.59M
EXC:
$46.88B
NOA:
CA$1.12
EXC:
$2.73
NOA:
17.02
EXC:
16.78
NOA:
0.45
EXC:
1.84
NOA:
1.14
EXC:
1.59
NOA:
CA$1.26B
EXC:
$25.33B
NOA:
CA$166.23M
EXC:
$6.22B
NOA:
CA$324.24M
EXC:
$9.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOA vs. EXC — Risk / Return Rank
NOA
EXC
NOA vs. EXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Exelon Corporation (EXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOA | EXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.06 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.41 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 0.93 | -1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOA vs. EXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOA drawdown since its inception was -93.59%, which is greater than EXC's maximum drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOA and EXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOA | EXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.59% | -62.27% | -31.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.32% | -13.74% | -14.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.67% | -18.89% | -31.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.67% | -29.06% | -21.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.41% | -40.04% | -28.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.86% | -8.03% | -35.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.58% | -20.00% | -35.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.25% | 6.11% | +9.14% |
Volatility
NOA vs. EXC - Volatility Comparison
North American Construction Group Ltd (NOA) and Exelon Corporation (EXC) have volatilities of 7.53% and 7.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOA | EXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 7.31% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.42% | 15.73% | +24.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.67% | 19.11% | +31.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.47% | 20.82% | +20.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.85% | 23.98% | +21.87% |
Dividends
NOA vs. EXC - Dividend Comparison
NOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than EXC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXC Exelon Corporation | 3.58% | 3.67% | 5.05% | 4.01% | 3.12% | 2.65% | 3.62% | 3.18% | 3.06% | 3.32% | 3.56% | 4.47% |
NOA North American Construction Group Ltd | 2.55% | 2.39% | 1.42% | 1.54% | 1.84% | 0.85% | 1.21% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 4.62% |
Financials
NOA vs. EXC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between North American Construction Group Ltd and Exelon Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NOA vs. EXC - Profitability Comparison
NOA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 42.36M and revenue of 320.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.2%.
EXC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exelon Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.0%.
NOA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported an operating income of 21.87M and revenue of 320.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
EXC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exelon Corporation reported an operating income of 979.00M and revenue of 5.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
NOA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, North American Construction Group Ltd reported a net income of 5.57M and revenue of 320.04M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
EXC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Exelon Corporation reported a net income of 396.00M and revenue of 5.97B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOA and EXC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOA has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to EXC (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOA dropped -93.59% vs EXC's -62.27%.
EXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOA and EXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer