GFL vs. BAH
Compare and contrast key facts about GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFL or BAH.
Key characteristics
| GFL | BAH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -5.26% | 18.52% |
| 1Y Return | -12.49% | 66.10% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.23% | 23.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.39 | 2.73 |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.53% | 24.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.59% | -32.40% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.47% | -1.18% |
Fundamentals
| GFL | BAH | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.34B | $19.11B |
| EPS | $0.00 | $3.11 |
| PE Ratio | 0.00 | 47.35 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.52B | $10.32B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $823.40M | $1.99B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $1.77B | $738.84M |
Correlation
The correlation between GFL and BAH is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GFL vs. BAH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GFL achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than BAH's 18.52% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFL vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFL vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison
GFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than BAH's 1.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | 0.16% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 1.27% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% | 9.14% | 7.26% |
Drawdowns
GFL vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFL drawdown since its inception was -42.59%, which is greater than BAH's maximum drawdown of -32.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFL and BAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFL vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison
GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) at 5.77%. This indicates that GFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GFL vs. BAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GFL Environmental Inc. and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities