GFL vs. FIVA
GFL (GFL Environmental Inc.) is a stock, while FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index. Over the past 5 years, GFL returned 1.95%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for FIVA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFL vs. FIVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFL achieves a -19.12% return, which is significantly lower than FIVA's 12.92% return.
GFL
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -19.12%
- 6M
- -22.64%
- 1Y
- -29.59%
- 3Y*
- -2.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- —
FIVA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
GFL vs. FIVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | -19.12% | -3.44% | 29.26% | 18.24% | -22.65% | 29.88% | 73.97% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 12.92% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | 12.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFL and FIVA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2020 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GFL and FIVA has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFL vs. FIVA — Risk / Return Rank
GFL
FIVA
GFL vs. FIVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFL | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.42 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 3.09 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.98 | 12.07 | -14.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFL | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.18 | 2.39 | -3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.77 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.49 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
GFL vs. FIVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFL drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than FIVA's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFL and FIVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFL | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.76% | -39.76% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.20% | -11.71% | -22.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.88% | -14.77% | -20.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.76% | -28.70% | -14.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.61% | -0.36% | -32.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -7.78% | -6.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.98% | 2.99% | +11.99% |
Volatility
GFL vs. FIVA - Volatility Comparison
GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) at 5.02%. This indicates that GFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFL | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 5.02% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.11% | 12.40% | +8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 15.18% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.77% | 16.33% | +13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.96% | 17.90% | +15.06% |
Dividends
GFL vs. FIVA - Dividend Comparison
GFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than FIVA's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.52% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% |
GFL GFL Environmental Inc. | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFL and FIVA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFL has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to FIVA (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFL dropped -42.76% vs FIVA's -39.76%.
FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFL and FIVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer