GFI vs. TME
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and TME (Tencent Music Entertainment Group) are both stocks. GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while TME operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, GFI returned 31.37%/yr vs -1.27%/yr for TME. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GFI vs. TME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -23.58% return, which is significantly higher than TME's -44.65% return.
GFI
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -33.43%
- YTD
- -23.58%
- 1Y
- 38.42%
- 3Y*
- 37.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.40%
TME
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 9.12%
- 6M
- -42.17%
- YTD
- -44.65%
- 1Y
- -53.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.92M | $118.13M | $131.61M | |
| $57.80M | $53.31M | $88.19M |
GFI vs. TME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -23.58% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | 13.18% |
TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | -44.65% | 56.39% | 27.12% | 8.82% | 20.88% | -64.40% | 63.88% | -11.20% | -6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and TME is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2018 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
GFI:
$29.02B
TME:
$14.52B
GFI:
$5.39
TME:
CN¥5.49
GFI:
6.01
TME:
11.62
GFI:
0.10
TME:
0.29
GFI:
2.07
TME:
3.06
GFI:
3.44
TME:
1.34
GFI:
$13.98B
TME:
CN¥32.50B
GFI:
$7.34B
TME:
CN¥18.52B
GFI:
$8.04B
TME:
CN¥13.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. TME — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
TME
GFI vs. TME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFI | TME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.75 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.79 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.70 | -1.19 | +2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFI vs. TME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, roughly equal to the maximum TME drawdown of -90.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and TME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | TME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -90.19% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.72% | -68.21% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.72% | -68.21% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -71.32% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.76% | -68.81% | +23.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -52.34% | +8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.70% | 45.17% | -22.47% |
Volatility
GFI vs. TME - Volatility Comparison
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) at 9.18%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | TME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.44% | 9.18% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.19% | 40.78% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.58% | 46.89% | +14.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.84% | 59.67% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.58% | 56.32% | -1.74% |
Dividends
GFI vs. TME - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than TME's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.68% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
TME Tencent Music Entertainment Group | 2.54% | 1.03% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GFI vs. TME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Tencent Music Entertainment Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFI vs. TME - Profitability Comparison
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
TME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported a gross profit of 3.52B and revenue of 7.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.9%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
TME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 7.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.6%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
TME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported a net income of 2.08B and revenue of 7.85B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and TME have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to TME (9.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs TME's -90.19%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFI and TME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer