PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TME vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TME vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TME achieves a -44.30% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -8.34% return.


TME

1D
0.11%
1M
4.51%
YTD
-44.30%
6M
-47.16%
1Y
-43.75%
3Y*
9.89%
5Y*
-8.34%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-4.17%
1M
6.71%
YTD
-8.34%
6M
-9.54%
1Y
-3.71%
3Y*
10.44%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
25.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TME vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
-44.30%56.39%27.12%8.82%20.88%-64.40%63.88%-11.20%-5.57%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-8.34%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%-6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between TME and MSFT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2018

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TME:

$14.79B

MSFT:

$3.29T

EPS

TME:

$5.49

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

TME:

1.73

MSFT:

26.28

PEG Ratio

TME:

0.04

MSFT:

1.84

PS Ratio

TME:

0.46

MSFT:

10.34

PB Ratio

TME:

0.20

MSFT:

7.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

TME:

$32.50B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TME:

$18.52B

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

TME:

$13.20B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TME vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TME
TME Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TME Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TME Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TME Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TME vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMEMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.94

-0.15

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.21

-0.04

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.00

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

-0.10

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-0.21

-0.93

TME vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TME Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TME and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMEMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

-0.15

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.50

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.75

-0.83

Drawdowns

TME vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TME drawdown since its inception was -90.19%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TME and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMEMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.19%

-69.38%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.01%

-33.91%

-33.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.01%

-33.91%

-33.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.52%

-37.15%

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.61%

-18.07%

-50.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-21.78%

-30.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.70%

15.90%

+20.80%

Volatility

TME vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) has a higher volatility of 12.93% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.31%. This indicates that TME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMEMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.93%

9.31%

+3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.75%

22.14%

+18.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.91%

24.92%

+21.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.02%

26.59%

+33.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.74%

27.03%

+29.71%

Dividends

TME vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

TME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than MSFT's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.81%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
TME
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
2.52%1.03%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TME vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tencent Music Entertainment Group and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
7.85B
82.89B
(TME) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TME vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tencent Music Entertainment Group and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
44.9%
67.6%
Portfolio components
TME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported a gross profit of 3.52B and revenue of 7.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.9%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

TME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 7.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.6%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

TME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Music Entertainment Group reported a net income of 2.08B and revenue of 7.85B, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TME and MSFT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TME has higher volatility (12.93%) compared to MSFT (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TME dropped -90.19% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TME and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer