PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFI vs. SII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GFI vs. SII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Sprott Inc (SII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -23.58% return, which is significantly lower than SII's 5.79% return.


GFI

1D
-3.31%
1M
-3.88%
6M
-33.43%
YTD
-23.58%
1Y
38.42%
3Y*
37.99%
5Y*
31.37%
10Y*
20.74%
ALL TIME*
6.40%

SII

1D
-3.43%
1M
-8.62%
6M
-15.56%
YTD
5.79%
1Y
55.19%
3Y*
50.62%
5Y*
25.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$102.92M$118.13M$131.61M
$12.82M$17.25M$21.64M

GFI vs. SII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-23.58%240.42%-6.27%44.90%-2.61%23.33%4.65%
SII
Sprott Inc
5.79%137.17%27.39%5.00%-24.09%59.43%-19.45%

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and SII is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2020

0.49

The correlation between GFI and SII shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFI:

$29.02B

SII:

$2.66B

EPS

GFI:

$5.39

SII:

$3.62

PE Ratio

GFI:

6.01

SII:

28.47

PEG Ratio

GFI:

0.10

SII:

0.76

PS Ratio

GFI:

2.07

SII:

6.38

PB Ratio

GFI:

3.44

SII:

5.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFI:

$13.98B

SII:

$377.77M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFI:

$7.34B

SII:

$278.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

GFI:

$8.04B

SII:

$120.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFI vs. SII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SII
SII Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SII Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SII Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SII Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SII Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFI vs. SII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Sprott Inc (SII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFISIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

1.46

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

3.42

-1.72

GFI vs. SII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the SII Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFI and SII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFI vs. SII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than SII's maximum drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and SII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFISIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.05%

-47.81%

-40.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.72%

-38.01%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.72%

-38.01%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.22%

-47.81%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.76%

-37.90%

-7.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.24%

-21.34%

-22.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.70%

16.20%

+6.50%

Volatility

GFI vs. SII - Volatility Comparison

Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 12.44% compared to Sprott Inc (SII) at 11.55%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFISIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.44%

11.55%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.19%

41.12%

+5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.58%

49.36%

+12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.84%

38.20%

+14.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.58%

38.00%

+16.58%

Dividends

GFI vs. SII - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than SII's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
5.68%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%
SII
Sprott Inc
1.46%1.33%2.49%2.95%3.00%2.22%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GFI vs. SII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Sprott Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GFI vs. SII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gold Fields Limited and Sprott Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

SII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sprott Inc reported a gross profit of 131.24M and revenue of 143.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

SII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sprott Inc reported an operating income of 41.26M and revenue of 143.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

SII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Sprott Inc reported a net income of 28.81M and revenue of 143.35M, resulting in a net margin of 20.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GFI and SII have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFI has higher volatility (12.44%) compared to SII (11.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs SII's -47.81%.

SII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFI and SII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer