PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GFI is traded in USD, while LOOMIS.ST is traded in SEK. To make them comparable, the LOOMIS.ST values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly lower than LOOMIS.ST's 21.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed LOOMIS.ST with an annualized return of 27.45%, while LOOMIS.ST has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


GFI

1D
1.67%
1M
-17.25%
YTD
-13.96%
6M
-13.63%
1Y
47.65%
3Y*
39.19%
5Y*
32.03%
10Y*
27.45%

LOOMIS.ST

1D
0.87%
1M
1.44%
YTD
21.67%
6M
29.31%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-13.96%240.42%-6.27%44.90%-2.61%23.33%43.02%89.47%-16.75%45.29%
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
21.67%44.36%20.85%0.54%6.63%-1.39%-31.90%34.11%-22.09%44.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and LOOMIS.ST is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2008

0.10

The correlation between GFI and LOOMIS.ST shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

LOOMIS.ST
LOOMIS.ST Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFILOOMIS.STDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.50

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

3.36

-0.30

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFI and LOOMIS.ST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than LOOMIS.ST's maximum drawdown of -65.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and LOOMIS.ST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFILOOMIS.STDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.05%

-65.38%

-22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.90%

-18.97%

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.90%

-23.32%

-20.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.22%

-31.85%

-24.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.09%

-65.38%

+2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.93%

-3.52%

-35.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-15.84%

-28.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.51%

8.44%

+8.07%

Volatility

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Volatility Comparison

Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 17.70% compared to Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) at 7.19%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOOMIS.ST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFILOOMIS.STDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.70%

7.19%

+10.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.40%

21.39%

+25.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.94%

27.14%

+32.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.37%

31.92%

+20.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.90%

34.93%

+19.97%

Dividends

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than LOOMIS.ST's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
5.04%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
4.29%3.59%3.72%4.48%2.97%2.49%2.43%2.58%3.15%2.32%2.58%2.27%

Financials

GFI vs. LOOMIS.ST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Loomis AB ser. B. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GFI values in USD, LOOMIS.ST values in SEK

Frequently Asked Questions


GFI and LOOMIS.ST have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFI and LOOMIS.ST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer