PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a SEK 10,000 investment in Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) and SCOR SE (SCR.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LOOMIS.ST is traded in SEK, while SCR.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SCR.PA values have been converted to SEK using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOOMIS.ST achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than SCR.PA's 12.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LOOMIS.ST has outperformed SCR.PA with an annualized return of 11.14%, while SCR.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.


LOOMIS.ST

1D
-0.88%
1M
7.51%
YTD
20.18%
6M
24.25%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
11.14%

SCR.PA

1D
0.05%
1M
2.40%
YTD
12.33%
6M
20.13%
1Y
10.21%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
20.18%20.26%32.10%-2.72%23.04%8.81%-40.30%39.64%-14.65%30.19%
SCR.PA
SCOR SE
12.33%22.95%-1.50%30.30%-9.32%13.87%-32.58%2.96%27.34%10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LOOMIS.ST and SCR.PA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2008

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOOMIS.ST
LOOMIS.ST Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOOMIS.ST Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SCR.PA
SCR.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SCR.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) and SCOR SE (SCR.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOOMIS.STSCR.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.10

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.54

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

1.14

+2.27

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOOMIS.ST Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the SCR.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOOMIS.ST and SCR.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOOMIS.STSCR.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.41

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.36

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.23

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.28

+0.25

Drawdowns

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOOMIS.ST drawdown since its inception was -61.81%, roughly equal to the maximum SCR.PA drawdown of -59.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOOMIS.ST and SCR.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOOMIS.STSCR.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.81%

-59.04%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.95%

-18.65%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-44.70%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.14%

-50.32%

+22.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.81%

-59.04%

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-8.51%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.71%

-14.05%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.79%

8.91%

-1.12%

Volatility

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Volatility Comparison

Loomis AB ser. B (LOOMIS.ST) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to SCOR SE (SCR.PA) at 8.71%. This indicates that LOOMIS.ST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCR.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOOMIS.STSCR.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

8.71%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

16.30%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.27%

24.74%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.35%

33.77%

-5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.84%

33.04%

-1.20%

Dividends

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Dividend Comparison

LOOMIS.ST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than SCR.PA's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOOMIS.ST
Loomis AB ser. B
4.46%3.59%3.72%4.48%2.97%2.49%2.43%2.58%3.15%2.32%2.58%2.27%
SCR.PA
SCOR SE
6.30%6.26%7.61%5.29%8.38%6.56%0.00%4.68%4.19%4.92%4.57%4.06%

Financials

LOOMIS.ST vs. SCR.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Loomis AB ser. B and SCOR SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LOOMIS.ST values in SEK, SCR.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


LOOMIS.ST and SCR.PA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOOMIS.ST and SCR.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer